![]() |
Today, it is generally accepted that the universe is a huge reactor
in which not only elemental chemistry
is performed but complex
molecules are also produced, similar to those used by existing
living systems. Moreover, these molecules travel freely between the
different cosmic regions. It is obvious that our solar system will
encounter some of them during its journey through the Milky Way
galaxy. But if many different components that are related to life are
reaching our planet at this very moment - by different means of
"piggyback" transport, for instance, inside comets or meteorites -
what is then the possibility that life originally came to Earth from
elsewhere, all ready? Once it landed here, it developed further into
the enormous variety of organisms we now find on Earth. This hypothesis is known as "panspermia". It is an old
idea, and until recently many scientists considered it to be
ridiculous, although important scientific names have been associated
with it (Svante Arrhenius, Francis Crick, Fred
Hoyle). However, it is now catching on because new experimental
and observational data challenge some of the main objections against
it. An important observation that has influenced this change of
attitude concerns the survival of a very common bacterium,
Streptococcus mitus (a normal inhabitant of the throat). Some
bacteria of this type were unintentionally taken to the Moon, on one
of the cameras mounted on the Surveyor 3 lander in the late
1960's. Amazingly, they remained alive ("viable") after more than one
year of full exposure to the very inhospitable conditions on the
surface of the Earth's natural satellite. The rescue, in sterile conditions, of the camera by the crew of the
Apollo 12 mission, and the bacterial growth observed after incubation
demonstrated
that normal bacteria, like S. mitus, clearly have the means to survive
under those extreme conditions to which they were exposed. This
unplanned experiment opened by chance the way to a new area of
research that is focused on finding out what the limits of life really
are. One of the biggest problems that life has to face during an
interplanetary excursion is radiation. In this sense, the
discovery of another bacteria, Deinococcus
radiodurans, that is able to resist enormous doses of
radiation, using efficient but otherwise common repair systems,
underlines the fact that life has created mechanisms to deal with this
important universal challenge. These results, together with the study of other organisms capable
of surviving or even to develop under other extreme conditions (the
extremophiles) have
opened an important area of astrobiological research into the
mechanisms of protection that have been developed by life and the
additional protection that is provided by external elements (rocks,
ice, new materials, etc.). But all these observations pale when compared with the enormous
noise introduced into the scientific world in the summer of 1996 when
D. McKey and other colleagues from NASA reported possible
signs of (fossil) life inside the Martian meteorite ALH 840001. Obviously the
scientists did not claim that their results were solid proof that life
could resist an interplanetary trip. Their main interest was to
discuss the possibility of life on our neighbouring planet. But the combined possibilities that life existed on a neighbouring
planet in our Solar system, together with the notion that its
signature resisted all of these destructive pressures is highly
interesting. If there are really signs of fossil life inside ALH 840001,
then they have "survived" the violent impact on Mars that ejected the
meteorite into space, the subsequent long interplanetary wandering,
the fiery entrance into the Earth's atmosphere and hard fall onto the
surface, and finally its cold lodging for many years in a frozen
Antartic valley. All of this has obvious implications for
the discussion
about the panspermia hypothesis. In spite of the raging, bitter debate that continues around that
Martian meteorite, a growing number of scientists, led by K. Zahule
from the AMES Research Center, have begun to consider the possibility
that life could have originated on Mars. "If you want to see a Martian
look in the mirror", is the graphic way to explain this idea. And
obviously the transfer of matter via ballistic orbits, as happened
for ALH 840001 is not just confined to Mars and Earth. This method
must be recurrent in our universe and might well form one basis for
panspermia. In spite of this, the concept of Cosmic Ancestry that has
been put forward by Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe is still
considered a very exotic proposal. According to this idea, not only
foreign life systems can arrive on our planet, but biological
evolution on Earth itself is considered to be a direct consequence of
panspermia under a universal Gaian process. Although it is
unlikely that conventional science will accept this point of view,
astrobiology can not ignore it because it has to consider all possible options. The search is
on!
|
Life in the Universe![]()
Origins and Limits of Life
Conditions Needed for Life
The Definition of Life
Conditions Needed for Life
Origin of Life (To be added soon!)
Boundary Conditions
Panspermia
![]()
Last updated September 3, 2001